The issue of unlawful deductions from wages, particularly concerning holiday pay, has been a significant concern for employers in the UK. The concept of a "series of unlawful deductions" has evolved through various legal interpretations and court rulings. The legal framework governing unlawful deductions from wages is primarily rooted in the Employment Rights Act 1996, which stipulates that deductions from wages must be lawful, either by statute, contract, or with the employee's consent. However, the interpretation of what constitutes a "series" of deductions has been subject to judicial scrutiny. The Supreme Court's decision in the case of Chief Constable of Northern Ireland v Agnew has been pivotal in shaping the current understanding. The Court ruled that a series of deductions is not necessarily broken by a gap of more than three months between underpayments, provided each deduction is factually linked by a common cause, such as incorrect holiday pay calculations.
In the case of Deksne v Ambitions Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld a claim for two years' worth of underpaid holiday payments. The employer conceded that the holiday pay had been incorrectly calculated. Initially, the employment tribunal ruled that the underpayments did not form a series due to gaps longer than three months between individual underpayments. However, the EAT, considering the Supreme Court's decision in Agnew, found that the tribunal had erred. The EAT substituted a finding of unlawful deductions from wages and ordered the employer to pay two years' worth of underpayments, emphasizing that gaps longer than three months do not necessarily break a series of deductions.
Implications for employers
The implications of these rulings are profound for employers. The removal of the three-month gap rule means that employers can no longer rely on such gaps to argue that a series of deductions has been broken. This change necessitates a thorough review of holiday pay calculations to ensure compliance with the law. Employers are advised to conduct audits of their holiday pay practices to identify any potential liabilities. The creation of the Fair Work Agency, tasked with enforcing holiday pay on behalf of workers, further underscores the importance of compliance.
Practical steps for employers
To mitigate the risk of claims for unlawful deductions, employers should consider the following practical steps:
Conduct a holiday pay audit: Review current holiday pay calculations to ensure they include all elements of normal remuneration, such as overtime and commissions.
Implement corrective measures: If discrepancies are found, take immediate corrective action to adjust holiday pay rates and rectify any underpayments.
Document changes: Clearly document any changes made to holiday pay calculations and communicate these changes to employees.
Seek legal advice: Consult with legal experts to understand the implications of recent rulings and ensure ongoing compliance with employment law.
Monitor legislative changes: Stay informed about any further legislative changes or court rulings that may impact holiday pay obligations.
Additional considerations
While the focus here is on holiday pay, the principles established in these cases apply to all types of unlawful deductions from wages. Employers should be aware that claims for unlawful deductions can extend beyond holiday pay to include other wage components, such as bonuses and allowances. The Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 impose a two-year backstop for claims in Great Britain, but this does not apply in Northern Ireland, where claims can potentially extend back to 1998. This distinction highlights the need for employers operating across different jurisdictions to tailor their compliance strategies accordingly.
This article was generated using Lex HR, an AI tool designed to assist HR professionals with employment law. If you find the content helpful, please explore Lex HR and sign up for a free trial to see how it can benefit your HR practices.
